Lee Traylor, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dan Reynolds; and Attorney General, of the State Ofoklahoma Respondents-appellees, 43 F.3d 1483 (10th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 43 F.3d 1483 (10th Cir. 1994) Dec. 14, 1994

Before TACHA, BRORBY, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order by the United States District Court for the District of Oklahoma dismissing Petitioner Lee Traylor's Petition for Habeas Corpus as a successive petition and abuse of the writ.2  After carefully reviewing the record and the arguments of the parties, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

 1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

 2

We issue a certificate of probable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253 and proceed to the merits on appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.