Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.edwin Sanchez, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellee.rafael Sanchez, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant, Appellee, 42 F.3d 1384 (1st Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAPPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge ]
Edwin Sanchez on brief pro se.
Cheryl J. Sturm on brief for appellant Rafael Sanchez.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Heidi E. Brieger, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
D. Mass.
Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
The district court's denial of the motions to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by appellants Edwin and Rafael Sanchez is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's September 14, 1993 memorandum and order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
