Bill Badi Gammoh, Dba Taboo Theater Aka Pelican Theater; Leslie West; Armine Michelle Bedrosian; Christine Johanna Fener; Charbonesse Garrett; Heather Eloise Elam; Stacy Joy Andre; Meghann Lara Ann Onselen, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. City of La Habra, Defendant-appellee, 402 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2005)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 402 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2005) Argued and Submitted November 1, 2004
Filed January 26, 2005
Amended April 1, 2005

Scott W. Wellman and Stuart Miller, Wellman & Warren, Laguna Hills, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Deborah J. Fox and Dawn A. McIntosh, Fox & Sohagi, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Scott D. Bergthold, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for Amicus Curiae League of California Cities.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-00911-GLT.

Before: TASHIMA, FISHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The court's opinion, filed January 26, 2005, is amended as follows:

The second paragraph on slip op. 1131, under heading "C", line 3: the words "leaves open" are deleted and replaced with, "does not unreasonably limit".

Slip op. 1135, first paragraph, line 2: the word "ample" shall be inserted between "open" and "alternative".

With these amendments, Judges Fisher and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Tashima so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. No judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.