United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roy C. Whitener, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Darin Davis, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas Scott, Defendant-appellant, 4 F.3d 988 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-345)
Roy C. Whitener, Darin Davis, Thomas Scott, Appellants Pro Se.
Matthew Raymond Hawley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Roy C. Whitener, Darin Davis, and Thomas Scott appeal from the district court's orders denying their motions for modification of sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Scott, No. CR-91345 (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
