Ralph Seagle, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joseph Hamilton; B. C. Lambert; Jerry Ikard; Joseph G.pickelsimer; Ray Cook; Kezial, First Name Unknown; R. M.jarvis; Mitch Johnson; John Hosehouser,defendants-appellees, 4 F.3d 986 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Ralph Seagle, Appellant Pro Se.
Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED
Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Ralph Seagle appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seagle v. Hamilton, No. CA-91-91-ST-C-MU (W.D.N.C. March 23, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Seagle's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
