United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian Callicott, Defendant-appellant, 39 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 39 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. *Decided Oct. 27, 1994

Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Brian Lee Callicott appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1) and 846. He contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search of the residence he rented with codefendant Susan Secomb. In United States v. Secomb, No. 94-30046 (unpublished disposition filed September 21, 1994), we reversed codefendant Secomb's conviction on the same grounds raised by Callicott. That holding is the law of the case and governs our decision here. See United States v. Schaff, 948 F.2d 501, 506 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, Callicott's conviction is

REVERSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.