Martin H. Stanwood, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Philip T. Abraham, Judge, Defendant-appellee, 39 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 39 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. *Decided Oct. 27, 1994

Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Oregon state prisoner Martin Stanwood appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Judge Abraham's denial of his application to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for reconsideration in a Multnomah County Circuit Court proceeding violated his right to access to the courts and due process. Stanwood seeks money damages and an injunction requiring "Judge Abraham to not violate [his] civil rights in any cause of action ... that [may] come before him in the future."1  For the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion, we

AFFIRM.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Stanwood's request for attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.