Norman Taylor, Plaintiff Appellant, v. United States of America; United States Department Ofcommerce; Ernest Ambler, Director, National Institute Ofstandards & Technology; Richard De La Menardiere, Nationalinstitute of Standards and Technology; Katherine Gebbie,center for Basic Standards, National Institute of Standardsand Technology; Helmut Hellwig, Acting Director, Nationalmeasurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards Andtechnology; Donald Johnson, Director, National Institute Ofstandards and Technology; Laura Powell, Deputy Director,national Measurement Laboratory, National Institute Ofstandards and Technology; Kurt Reimann, Deputy Director,national Measurement Laboratory, National Institute Ofstandards and Technology; Elizabeth W. Stroud, Personnelofficer, National Institute of Standards and Technology,defendants Appellees, 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994) Oct. 12, 1994. Submitted Oct. 12, 1993. Decided Oct. 12, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-213-R)

Norman Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Ethan L. Bauman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Norman Taylor appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendants in Taylor's age discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. United States, No. CA-89-213-R (D. Md. Nov. 12, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.