Allan J. Favish, Plaintiff-appellant, v. National Archives and Records Administration,* Defendant-appellee,sheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-appellees.allan J. Favish, Plaintiff-appellee, v. National Archives and Records Administration,* Defendant,sheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-appellants.allan J. Favish, Plaintiff-appellee, v. National Archives and Records Administration,* Defendant-appellant, Andsheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Defendants-intervenors, 368 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2004)
Annotate this CaseAllan J. Favish, Santa Clarita, CA, pro se.
James Hamilton, Esq., Washington, DC, G. Andrew Lundberg, Esq., Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for Intervenors-Appellees/Intervenors-Appellants/Defendants-intervenors.
Robert M. Loeb, Esq., Leonard Schaitman, Esq., Washington, DC, Jan L. Luymes, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee/Defendant/Defendant-Appellant.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before PREGERSON, NOONAN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The case is remanded to the district court to enter judgment for the National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S. Ct. 1570, 158 L. Ed. 2d 319 (2004).
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion in National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish, filed on March 30, 2004, National Archives and Records Administration has been substituted for Office of Independent Counsel.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
