William A. Knauss; Yoko Knauss, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Tallack Maakestad; Beth Maakestad Stewart Cleave, Judith W.cleave; Tallack Maakestad & Associates, Inc.,defendants-appellees, 36 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 36 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted May 11, 1994. *Decided June 29, 1994

Before: CHOY, SKOPIL and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

William and Yoko Knauss appeal the district court's order dismissing their complaint and denying their motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Appellees request attorneys' fees.

This court lacks jurisdiction over the district court's March 4, 1993 Order dismissing the appellants' complaint without prejudice because that Order did not constitute a final order. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the March 4, 1993 Order was not a final appealable order, the district court did not err by denying the Knauss' motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal from that Order.

The appeal is DISMISSED. Appellees' request for attorneys' fees is DENIED.

The panel unanimously found this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.