Richard O. Weeks, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, Camden, S.c.,defendant Appellee, 36 F.3d 1096 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 36 F.3d 1096 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: Aug. 25, 1994Decided: Sept. 19, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2389-3-17-B)

Richard O. Weeks, Appellant Pro Se.

Terri Hearn Bailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, SC; Lori Joan Dym, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weeks v. Postmaster General, No. CA-92-2389-3-17-B (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.