Sonny Boy Webb, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Environmental Protection Agency; William K. Reilly,administrator, Office of Administration Andresources Management, Rtp, N.c.; Williee. Greenstreet, Director,defendants Appellees, 36 F.3d 1096 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 36 F.3d 1096 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Aug. 30, 1994Decided Sept. 23, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-72-1)

Sonny Boy Webb, appellant pro se.

Gill Paul Beck, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in Appellant's action seeking a job promotion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Webb v. EPA, No. CA-92-72-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The district court did not expressly address Appellant's retaliation claim. Because Appellee presented a legitimate reason for the incidents about which Appellant complains, we find that, even if he made a prima facie showing of retaliation, Appellant was not entitled to relief on this claim. Cf. Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.