John W. Waterman, Petitioner-appellant, v. William Perrill, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 35 F.3d 573 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 35 F.3d 573 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Sept. 7, 1994. *Decided Sept. 13, 1994

Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

John Waterman appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order. We decline to consider Waterman's other challenges to his conviction and sentence, raised for the first time in this appeal. See United States v. Keller, 902 F.2d 1391, 1395 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.