Anthony Lambert, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,andmarion Knight Lambert; Anthony Lambert, Jr.; Antowinlambert, Plaintiffs, v. District Attorney Office; H. P. Williams, Jr., Defendantsappellees.marion Knight Lambert; Anthony Lambert, Jr.; Antowinlambert, Plaintiffs Appellants,andanthony Lambert, Sr., Plaintiff, v. District Attorney Office; H. P. Williams, Jr., Defendants Appellees, 34 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 34 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: July 19, 1994. Decided: August 4, 1994

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-41-5-MC)

Anthony Lambert, Sr., Marion Knight Lambert, Anthony Lambert, Jr., Antowin Lambert, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lambert v. District Attorney, CA-94-41-5-MC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.