United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Mohd Shahzad Ali, Defendant-appellant, 33 F.3d 60 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 33 F.3d 60 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Aug. 23, 1994. *Decided Aug. 25, 1994

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Mohd Shahzad Ali appeals the 48-month sentence imposed following his entry of guilty pleas to conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ali's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

The motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.