Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That No Party May Cite an Opinion Not Intended for Publication Unless the Cases Are Related by Identity Between the Parties or the Causes of Action.united States of America, Appellee, v. Gary A. Ebeck, Appellant, 33 F.3d 57 (8th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 33 F.3d 57 (8th Cir. 1994) Submitted: August 8, 1994. Filed: August 12, 1994

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Gary A. Ebeck pleaded guilty to kidnapping on government land and to using firearms in relation to the kidnapping. At Ebeck's sentencing, the district court found Ebeck was a leader of the group that committed the kidnapping and enhanced Ebeck's sentence under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.1(c). On appeal, Ebeck contends the district court's finding of his leadership role is clearly erroneous. See United States v. Horne, 4 F.3d 579, 590 (8th Cir. 1993) (standard of review), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1121 (1994).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we disagree. Ebeck's codefendants testified that Ebeck made decisions, played a major part in planning and committing the kidnapping, and exercised control over others-all relevant factors in the leadership determination. See U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.1 n. 4. Although Ebeck disputed his codefendants' testimony, the district court's findings as to witness credibility "are 'virtually unreviewable on appeal.' " United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d 1468, 1472 (8th Cir. 1993) (quoted citations ommitted). Accordingly, we affirm Ebeck's sentence.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.