Austen O. Nwanze, Petitioner Appellant, v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondent Appellee, 33 F.3d 52 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-722)
Austen Nwanze, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Nwanze v. Attorney Gen. of Virginia, No. CA-93-722 (E.D. Va. May 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
The parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (3) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
