William v. Luna, Petitioner-appellant, v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-appellees, 311 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2002)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 311 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2002) Argued and Submitted February 12, 2002
Filed September 27, 2002
Amended November 27, 2002

Craig Wilke, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

Chung L. Mar, State of California Attorney General's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-02655-WJR(EE).

Before FERGUSON, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The mandate is recalled and the opinion filed September 27, 2002 [306 F.3d 954], is amended as follows:

The last sentence of the opinion which reads:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects to retry Luna within 90 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

is amended to read as follows:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects, within 90 days of the issuance of the mandate, to retry Luna. Any such retrial shall commence within a reasonable time thereafter to be set by the District Court.

The mandate is to reissue forthwith.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.