United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. David Allen Hagen Defusco, Defendant Appellant, 30 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-89-349, CA-93-462)
David Allen Hagen DeFusco, appellant Pro Se.
Robert Clifford Chesnut, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. DeFusco, Nos. CR-89-349; CA-93-462 (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 1993).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is, therefore, dismissed. We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984) ("The power to appoint [counsel] is a discretionary one....")
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
