Donald Martin Bentson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Defendant-appellee, 28 F.3d 104 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 28 F.3d 104 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted June 6, 1994. *Decided June 21, 1994

Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Donald M. Bentson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action seeking judicial review of the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (Secretary) decision denying his request to reopen his 1988 application for disability benefits. Bentson argues the district court erred by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Secretary's decision not to reopen the prior proceeding. We have squarely rejected Bentson's argument. See Panages v. Bowen, 871 F.2d 91, 92-93 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curiam). We deny all Bentson's outstanding requests and motions in this case.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.