Patricia E. Gentala and Robert A. Gentala, Plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees v. the City of Tucson, Defendant-appellee-cross-appellant, 275 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2002)
Annotate this CaseBefore: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Thomas G. Nelson, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.
This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, _______ U.S._______, 122 S. Ct. 340, 151 L. Ed. 2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S. Ct. 2093, 150 L. Ed. 2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.
Judge Fernandez dissents.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
