Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.david W. Eisenberg, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Robert Mcdonnell, et al., Defendants, Appellees, 27 F.3d 554 (1st Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ]
David W. Eisenberg on brief pro se.
D. Mass.
AFFIRMED.
Before Torruella, Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
The orders of the district court that are the subject of this appeal are affirmed. Plaintiff- appellant David Eisenberg's brief offers no argument in support of this appeal, instead raising irrelevant challenges to this court's actions in prior appeals filed by him. In any event, we see no error in the district court's orders.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
