Mary K. Hudson, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 25 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 25 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 1994) June 10, 1994

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1 

Before SEYMOUR Chief Judge, McKAY and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.2 

Petitioner Mary K. Hudson, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's dismissal of her third Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, 28 U.S.C. 2255. The district court dismissed the petition as successive and an abuse of the writ. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we affirm.

We have read Petitioner's brief and reviewed the record. We affirm for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court's order.

 1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

 2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.