At&t Communications of the Southwest, Inc.; et al., Plaintiffs,at&t Communications of the Southwest, Inc.; Taylor Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. City of Dallas, Texas, Defendant,southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant.caprock Communications Corp.; Golden Harbor of Texas, Inc.; Westel, Inc., Plaintiffs-appellees, v. City of Dallas, Texas, Defendant,southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant.sprint Communications Company, Lp, Plaintiff-appellee, v. City of Dallas, Texas, Defendant,southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant, 249 F.3d 336 (5th Cir. 2001)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before HILL,* JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
The petition for rehearing filed by Sprint Communications Company is DENIED.
On March 26, 2001, Teligent, Inc. submitted a letter requesting a correction in the language of the March 15, 2001 opinion in this case. Treating the letter as a petition for rehearing, the petition is granted as follows: Footnote ** will be added after the first sentence of the first paragraph. This footnote will read as follows:
Southwestern Bell filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against Teligent, Inc. ("Teligent"), which this court granted on March 30, 2000. Thus, the judgment in favor of Teligent is not affected by this appeal.
In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged, and all other relief is DENIED.
Circuit Judge of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
