In Re Grand Jury Subpoena.doe One, Inc., Intervenor-appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 24 F.3d 246 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- 24 F.3d 246 (9th Cir. 1994)
Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994. Decided May 16, 1994
Before: SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The court has reviewed the record in this case and heard the arguments of counsel. The order of the district court denying the motion to quash the subpoena is affirmed. The appellant has provided no basis in this record for us to hold that the denial was in error or that compliance with the district court's order, will result in any substantial revelation of Mr. Holmes' attorney work product.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
