Eaglet Corporation Limited, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Banco Central De Nicaragua, Defendant-appellee, 23 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseJohn R. Foster, New York City (Waesche, Sheinbaum & O'Regan, P.C., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant Eaglet Corp. Ltd.
George Weisz, New York City (Chaya F. Weinberg-Brodt, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Banco Cent. de Nicaragua.
Before: FEINBERG, VAN GRAAFEILAND and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. See Eaglet Corp. v. Banco Central de Nicaragua, 839 F. Supp. 232 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). However, because the dismissal of the complaint was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, both parties agree that the dismissal must be without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; see generally Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 284-88, 81 S. Ct. 534, 544-46, 5 L. Ed. 2d 551 (1961).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
