Raymond Stokes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. David A. Williams; Thomas R. Lanyi, Defendants-appellees, 23 F.3d 403 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-1177-AM)
Raymond Stokes, Appellant Pro Se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; William Rittenhouse Culbreth, Russell, Cantor, Arkema & Edmonds, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stokes v. Williams, No. CA-92-1177-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1993; Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Although Stokes did not receive the notice required by Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), on this record we find this to be harmless error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 61
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
