In Re Aaron Holsey, Petitioner, 23 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 23 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted March 17, 1994. Decided April 4, 1994

Aaron Holsey, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Aaron Holsey petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to reassign his cases in the District of Maryland to another district judge. Holsey has failed to show any bias on the part of the district judge that would warrant recusal. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827-32 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.