Ronald Hayward, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Mary Mills; Lynn Mann; John Peterson; F. Warren, Captain;kenneth Taylor, Warden; Richard Lanham,commissioner; J. Joseph Curran, Jr.,attorney General, Defendants Appellees, 23 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-18-N)
Ronald Hayward, Appellant Pro Se.
D. Md.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order which denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice. Because Appellant could cure the defects in his complaint through amendment, the order dismissing his complaint is not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Furthermore, Appellant's motion for injunctive relief to facilitate this appeal is dismissed as moot
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
