Jeanne B. Tomberlin, Drew Tomberlin, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 23 F.3d 369 (11th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 23 F.3d 369 (11th Cir. 1994) June 22, 1994

John W. Denney, Allen C. Levi, Denney, Pease, Allison, Kirk & Lomax, Columbus, GA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Edgar W. Ennis, Jr., U.S. Atty., Hugh Randolph Aderhold, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, GA, Vicki R. Crowell, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Staff Judge Advocate's Office, Fort Benning, GA, for defendant-appellee.

John C. Sammon, President, State Bar of GA, Emmet J. Bondurant, II, John E. Floyd, J. Scott McClain, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Atlanta, GA, for amicus curiae State Bar of GA.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 92-CV-158-COL), J. Robert Elliott, Judge.

Before EDMONDSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


We are advised in this appeal by our decision in Brown v. Nichols, 8 F.3d 770 (11th Cir. 1993), which was released after the district court's decision in this case. The reasoning in Brown, a diversity case, also fits this Federal Tort Claim's Act case. For that reason, the district court's judgment dismissing the action is reversed, and this case is remanded with instructions to permit the appellants to amend their complaint to attach the affidavit of Dr. William Hayes that they had proffered before judgment was entered.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.