Faustino S. Somera, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 19 F.3d 41 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 19 F.3d 41 (Fed. Cir. 1994) Feb. 23, 1994

Before RICH, PLAGER, and RADAR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


DECISION

Faustino S. Somera petitions for review of the November 10, 1992 initial decision of an Administrative Judge (AJ), Docket No. SE-0831-92-0358-I-1, sustaining a decision by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that Mr. Somera is not entitled to a deferred annuity under the Civil Service Retirement Act (CSRA) based on his civilian service in various positions with the War Department from October 1, 1945 to December 5, 1955. The AJ's decision became the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) on April 30, 1993 when it denied review of the AJ's initial decision. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

As the applicant, Mr. Somera must "demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the retirement benefit he seeks." True v. Office of Personnel Management, 926 F.2d 1151, 1153 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Mr. Somera has failed to meet this burden. The record is devoid of any evidence indicating that Mr. Somera has ever been employed in a position "covered" by the CSRA, a prerequisite to entitlement to benefits. In addition, the record does not suggest, nor does Mr. Somera assert, that civil service retirement deductions were ever withheld from his salary. Indeed, as noted by the AJ, several documents of record relating to Mr. Somera's employment, namely Notifications of Personnel Action and Payroll Change Slips, clearly indicate that his employment was not subject to the CSRA and that no deductions from his pay were made for retirement purposes.

We review Board decisions under a very narrow standard, affirming them unless they are (1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1988); see Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel Management, 791 F.2d 138, 140 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1037 (1987). Finding no such grounds present here, we must affirm.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.