United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Miquel Calderon-menendez, Aka Miquel Calderon-melendez,defendant-appellant, 19 F.3d 1441 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 19 F.3d 1441 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted March 8, 1994. *Decided March 14, 1994. As Amended March 30, 1994

Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Miguel Calderon-Menendez appeals his convictions and 120-month sentence, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess or distribute and attempting to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Calderon-Menendez's counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief stating that she finds no arguable issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. We deny Calderon-Menendez's second motion for an extension of time to file a pro se supplemental brief

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.