Omar Indoosi, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director; T. Leonard, Sergeant; C.j.clay, Lieutenant; J.k. Gregory, Sergeant; P.a. Terrangi,deputy Warden; G.r. Rowlette, Regional Ombudsman; J.a.holland, Institutional Doctor; N. Jones, Captain; L.pearson, Medical Transportation Officer; W.h. Graves,lieutenant; K.o. White, Adjustment Committee Chairman;r.c. Johnson, Reporting Officer; M. Chisholm, Correctionalofficer; A.w. Moody, Sergeant; W. Brown, Operationsofficer; C. Long, Sergeant; R. Tillery, Treatment Teamchairman; C.m. Parker, Treatment Program Supervisor; W.a.mcmillen, Law Library Supervisor; F. Kafka, Grievancecoordinator; J.a. Smith, Regional Administrator; E.wright, Warden; C. Purrington, Sergeant, C.o. Gibbs,lieutenant, Defendants Appellees, 19 F.3d 1429 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 19 F.3d 1429 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Feb. 16, 1994. Decided April 7, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-357-R)

Omar Indoosi, appellant pro se.

Alan Katz, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.*  Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Indoosi v. Murray, No. CA-92-357-R (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (1) (West 1993)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.