United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Defendant Appellant, 19 F.3d 13 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 19 F.3d 13 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994. Decided: Feb. 24, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, appellant Pro Se.

Stephen L. Purcell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Nasim's motions for a reduction of sentence and for recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim, No. CR-88-378-HM (D. Md. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.