United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Aaron Little, Defendant-appellant, 19 F.3d 12 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 19 F.3d 12 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. Decided March 4, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-87-19-P, CA-92-40-P-3)

Michael Aaron Little, Appellant Pro Se.

Carl Horn, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C. AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Little, Nos. CR-87-19-P; CA-92-40-P-3 (W.D.N.C. July 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We deny Little's pending motion objecting to the government's request for additional time in which to file an informal brief. We also deny his motion seeking reconsideration of the Clerk's order granting the request for additional time, and his motion for oral argument

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.