Mark Steven Fortier, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Travis Medlock, South Carolina State Attorney General;cameron Currie, State Solicitor; Pete Logan, State Lawenforcement Division Agent; Paul Atencio, State Lawenforcement Division Agent; James Charlton, Postalinspector; Paul Short, Jr., Circuit Court Judge, in Theirofficial and Personal Capacity Under the Color of State Law,defendants-appellees.mark Steven Fortier, Plaintiff-appellant, v. George Speedy, Attorney at Law, Defendant-appellee, 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Jan. 3, 1994. Decided March 1, 1994

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-92-3312-3-18AJ, CA-92-3313-3-18AJ)

Mark Steven Fortier, pro se.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Mark Steven Fortier appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fortier v. Medlock, No. CA-92-3312-3-18AJ (D.S.C. July 12, 1993); Fortier v. Speedy, No. CA-92-3313-3-18AJ (D.S.C. July 12, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.