United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit, 169 F.3d 594 (9th Cir. 1999)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-00504-TEH.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-94-00963-HG/FIY.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-04044-DLJ.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-02530-NAJ.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-96-03253-DLJ.
Before: HUG, Chief Judge, BROWNING, FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T. G. NELSON, KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Prior report: 160 F.3d 1259
ORDER
Appellee American Airlines filed a "Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc" due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:
The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: "Prior to obtaining the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel."
With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
