United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bonard Ray Deninno, Defendant-appellant, 166 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CasePORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, C.J.
PORFILIO, C.J.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied the motion, and plaintiff appeals. We construe plaintiff's notice of appeal as an application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Because plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2), we deny the request for a certificate of appealability. The appeal is DISMISSED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
