Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Arrie W. Davis, Judge; Jane Doe, Court Clerk; John Doe,deputy Court Clerk; Earl L. Carey, Jr., Esquire; Arthur A.delano, Jr., Esquire; Carol E. Chance, Esquire; Stephen H.sachs, Esquire; Joseph Curran; David Yuan Li; Audreycreighton; Dianne E. Keller; Kurt L. Schmoke; Garyhonick; Nathaniel Augustus El; Renee Chance; William D.schaefer, Defendants-appellees, 16 F.3d 410 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Corut for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-93-2363-L).
Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph Curran, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Davis, No. CA-93-2363-L (D. Md. Aug. 25, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
