Richard T. Eno, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development,defendant, Appellee, 16 F.3d 401 (1st Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Richard T. Eno on brief pro se.
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Suzanne E. Durrell, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
D. Mass.
AFFIRMED.
Before Breyer, Chief Judge, Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. The district court order of May 6, 1993, which denied appellant's motion to reinstate his lawsuit and to consider appellant's motion for summary judgment filed in October 1990, was neither erroneous nor an abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
