United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Juan Manuel Galindo-sotelo, Akas: Juan Manuel Galindo; Johngalindo, Defendant-appellant, 145 F.3d 1342 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 145 F.3d 1342 (9th Cir. 1998) Submitted May 14, 1998**.Decided May 20, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John G. Davies, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SCHROEDER, TROTT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

Juan Manuel Galindo-Sotelo appeals his 70-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation and conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b) (2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Galindo-Sotelo contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant him a downward departure for diminished capacity, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13. Because Galindo-Sotelo did not raise this issue in the district court, we review for plain error, and find none. See United States v. Kaneakua, 15 F.3d 463, 468 (9th Cir. 1997). The facts before the district court do not support a downward departure based on diminished capacity. See U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13 (1995) (diminished mental capacity must have contributed to the commission of the crime); United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 737, 113 S. Ct. 1770, 123 L. Ed. 2d 508 (1993) (stating that there must be a clear and obvious error that affects a substantial right).

Galindo-Sotelo also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his sentencing hearing. We decline to reach the merits of this claim because ineffective assistance claims are more appropriately addressed in collateral habeas proceedings. See United States v. Carr, 18 F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.