Sal Pereyra, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hughes Market, Inc.; Teamster Local 630, Defendants-appelees, 142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998) .Submitted April 20, 19982. Decided April 28, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM1 

Sal Pereyra appeals an order granting summary judgment in which the district court stated that " [t]he Court may amend or amplify this order with a more specific statement of the grounds for its decision." No separate judgment was entered. We lack jurisdiction because the district court has not issued a final, appealable order. See National Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. ., 117 F.3d 432 (9th Cir. 1997). Because there was no final appealable order, Pereyra's motion to reopen the time to file a notice of appeal was premature.

DISMISSED.

 2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.