United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Cirilo Barcenas-serrano, Defendant-appellant, 141 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 1998) .Submitted Mar. 10, 19982. Decided Mar. 19, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William B. Enright, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM1 

Cirilo Barcenas-Serrano appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to bring in, transport and harbor aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a) (1) (A) (II) and (III) and (a) (2) (B) (ii), bringing in illegal aliens for financial gain, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1324(a) (2) (B) (ii), and for other crimes having to do with transporting aliens and issuing false identification documents. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we dismiss.

The government contends that Barcenas-Serrano waived his right to appeal. Waiver of a statutory right to appeal is reviewed de novo. See United States v. Baramydka, 95 F.3d 840, 843 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 117 S. Ct. 1282, 137 L. Ed. 2d 357 (1997). Barcenas-Serrano knowingly and voluntarily agreed to waive "any right to appeal or to collaterally attack the conviction and sentence ... unless the court imposes a custodial sentenced greater than 33 months." In accordance with the plea agreement and upon the government's recommendation, the district court sentenced Barcenas-Serrano to 33 months. Accordingly, Barcenas-Serrano waived his right to contest his sentence on appeal.

DISMISSED.

 2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.