Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.jeffrey Kurtzman, Appellant, v. Washington University, a Benevolent Corporation, Appellee, 141 F.3d 1168 (8th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 141 F.3d 1168 (8th Cir. 1998) Submitted March 10, 1998. Filed March 17, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Jeffrey Kurtzman sued The Washington University, claiming disparate-treatment sex and race discrimination, denial of due process, and breach of contract. The District Court1  granted summary judgment for the defendant and dismissed the First Amended Complaint. The court also denied Kurtzman's untimely motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Kurtzman appeals the orders granting summary judgment and denying his motion for leave to amend.

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the arguments of the parties, we find no error of law or abuse of discretion in the District Court's rulings. We also find that the case does not offer sufficient precedential value to warrant an opinion. Accordingly, we forego extended discussion.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

 1

The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.