James S. Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Department of the Navy; David Earthum; Jimmie Dikes;charlie Kane; E.j. Lowery, Captain; H. Lawrencegarrett, Iii, Secretary of the Navy,defendants-appellees, 14 F.3d 599 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston, Nos. CA-92-272-18AJ, CA-92-273-18AJ; David C. Norton, District Judge.
James S. Williams, appellant pro se.
Joseph Preston Strom, Jr., U.S. Atty., Columbia, SC, for appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment in his employment discrimination actions. Our review of the records and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Department of Navy, Nos. CA-92-272-18AJ, CA-92-273-18AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
