David Bright, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sewall Smith; Theodore Purnell; Lloyd Hopkins; Donaldbisser; Robert Boyce; P. Briggs, Defendant Appellees, 14 F.3d 593 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2849-N)
David Bright, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and the attached "Motion to Re-Open or Motion to Refile Civil Right [sic] Complaint." Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bright v. Smith, No. CA-93-2849-N (D. Md. Oct. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
