Rose Kabbe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of San Diego; Police Chief; City of San Diego Policedepartment; Melvin W. Miller; State Hotel;channel 8, Defendants-appellees, 139 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Judith N. Keep, Chief District Judge, Presiding.
Before PREGERSON, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Rose Kabbe appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of her action alleging that numerous defendants conspired to violate her civil rights by intercepting and broadcasting her thoughts. We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Kabbe's action because her claims are fanciful, delusional and legally frivolous. See Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 104 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1989). The district court properly denied Kabbe leave to amend because it is "absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment." See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Kabbe's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
