United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Pedro Luna-maradiaga, Defendant-appellant, 134 F.3d 380 (9th Cir. 1998)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 134 F.3d 380 (9th Cir. 1998) Jan. 15, 1998. **

Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

McKIBBEN, District Judge.

We lack jurisdiction to review Luna-Maradiaga's sentence because it was within the applicable guideline range. See United States v. Pelayo-Bautista, 907 F.2d 99 (9th Cir. 1990).

DISMISSED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.