Charles L. Smith, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley Dean, Mayor; James Keane, Jr., Karen Moore; Cityof Berkeley, Dashel Butler, Defendants-appellees, 132 F.3d 40 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 132 F.3d 40 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Dec. 15, 1997. **Dec. 18, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Fern M. Smith, District Judge, Presiding

Before SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Charles L. Smith appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of standing of his civil rights action alleging that the Berkeley parking enforcement scheme violates his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and after de novo review, see Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. Jensen, 108 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 1997), we affirm.1 

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

 1

Smith's request for leave to file exhibits with his reply brief is denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.