Edel Loredo-corrales, Petitioner-appellant, v. J.j.c. Higgins, Associate Commissioner for Enforcement, Insrespondent-appellee, 132 F.3d 39 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona C.A. Muecke, District Judge, Presiding
Before SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Edel Loredo-Corrales appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his detention. The appellee's motion to dismiss is granted, and we dismiss.
Loredo-Corrales contends that the Immigration and Naturalization Service has failed to find him an alternative to detention in the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Here, subsequent to his appeal Loredo-Corrales was released from custody and granted immigration parole. Since Loredo-Corrales was seeking an alternative to incarceration at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and because he has since been released, there is no further relief we can provide. See Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.